From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [10.226.151.72] ([166.175.191.168]) by ewsd; Thu Jan  3 12:20:20 EST 2019
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [9front] T60 regression?
From: Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C101)
In-Reply-To: <4123C112B7FB44E8BD169F423FB4DC96@felloff.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:20:18 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <001EF9A9-8C6A-41C2-9A73-0D156973B0F3@stanleylieber.com>
References: <4123C112B7FB44E8BD169F423FB4DC96@felloff.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: agile progressive STM property just-in-time-based metadata 

> maybe its not really a regression but the mp tables
> where always broken on T60?

IIRC, mp tables were broken on *60 and *61. Way back when, I had to use the *=
mptables=3D (or whatever it was) hack. Again IIRC, this hack was removed whe=
n we got *acpi=3D.

sl