From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from cmo-0001.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.62]) by ewsd; Wed Jul  1 01:37:31 EDT 2020
Received: from cmr-0002.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.119])
	by cmo with ESMTP
	id qVL2jrN3UL3UqqVR2j7WMu; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 14:37:28 +0900
Received: from titan.jitaku.localdomain ([182.164.22.198])
	by cmr with ESMTPA
	id qVR1jhDRIZdRNqVR2jmhH5; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 14:37:28 +0900
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	s=x01; t=1593581848; i=kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	bh=aSeDFvurTHAIXEkpqqcDGHMzHXOjtVKcXE6/TdiwnTg=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=zRODXk1i1Sm08cFMo3I1N64IhE3SsyQBf2b+EyOL7IIO+Sdfqu778+D22MX92QDAD
	 Z/9rPS/OtUYbf6BO4EDCaILKwSWCeplDj6pN0KPJSb03iuu/5GkhBU6fnEqcNM0jRJ
	 ADbYqy6ctKB3TJXsaSAWSFA8MKGbaUShdR7MmlqqIl16hDJUcfktbK6DVpON3CdAgI
	 tiPgd4KbMWK0GmO77Z4J/8foFqj/CjTKg7HFovNwlN83Lj8vakmHOnKfyI1b0H7g0c
	 s1GXke5WFJp3WDhf/F/r86NKLaeLwBjHCElXp8VNyTN35Lqr1zSqRFZ03tSCybxe6T
	 P0tRaH4+0omCQ==
Message-ID: <01256F7E49252A911BC4AD2B3D7D6F0C@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: x509.c for ape in libsec.a
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:37:26 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: YAML over ACPI plugin replication 

I'm playing with python2.7.6 on 9front.
The ape/libsec.a file for this port makes x509-ape.c instead of x509.c on the fly by the line:

x509-ape.c:	../../../../libsec/port/x509.c
	cat ../../../../libsec/port/x509.c | \
	sed 's/Tm \*tm = gmtime\(t\)/struct tm *tm0 = gmtime\(\&t\)/;s/tm->/tm0->tm_/g' | \
	sed 's/static //g' > x509-ape.c

Essential part is 's/static //g' to use is_seq etc ib cpython/Plan9/_ssl9.c.
Is this OK? for 9front system?

Kenji

PS: I hve permission to port python2.7.6 to 9front from jas.
Porting 2.7.6 is not so bright because it has no implementation of _ctypes() module.
So, this just a play...