From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 28356 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2023 01:07:43 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Oct 2023 01:07:43 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Tue Oct 3 21:04:41 -0400 2023 Received: from stockyard.lan ( [172.56.162.145]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6ee81e9f (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <051BE365BDD4F4BC4AF19C6300D44B62@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 21:04:36 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <0BF086A514DDC564F68D9C0A7862D9C3@smtp.pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: DOM-based full-stack CMS generator Subject: Re: [9front] DNS/ICMP via sshnet(4) or drawterm Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth unobe@cpan.org: > Quoth ori@eigenstate.org: > > if the goal is dns, it may be better to simply make us > > fall back to dns-over-tcp. > > Thanks for pointing that out, Ori. I didn't know about dns-over-tcp; > I never had to do a request that required it, apparently. That would > entail modifying ndb/dns*, yeah? > > My other major use case is ping. I see that there is such a thing as > ping-over-tcp. I suppose one of the use cases for providing > ping-over-tcp is seeing if packet-shaping is having an impact on a > connection. That would suggest to me that ip/ping would be modified, > or just a separate utility. > I don't think ICMP forwarding is worth the effort; it's ok to just not have it.