From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15135 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2021 02:37:36 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Jun 2021 02:37:36 -0000 Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by 1ess; Mon May 31 07:55:57 -0400 2021 Message-ID: <05B34B036B7AB83D8B159A53FED697A6@felloff.net> Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 13:55:48 +0200 From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <143CF0E38A4C37EFF206B9E296969CC4@fulton.software> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: self-healing compliant realtime-java enhancement YAML over SOAP out-scaling app Subject: Re: [9front] ssl deprecation Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk and what todo with pushssl(2) and cpu(1), import(4) and oexportfs(4)? if you kill devssl, you break any remoting supporting with inferno and classic plan9. i wanted to kill it along time ago especially as devssl had kernel crash bugs. but you need to explain the consequences of your changes clearly and stand the discussion with people wanting to run 9front together with inferno and labs plan9 installations. -- cinap