From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=5.0 tests=BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7446 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2021 16:45:04 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Feb 2021 16:45:04 -0000 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([91.121.223.63]) by 1ess; Tue Feb 9 10:59:03 -0500 2021 Message-ID: <0951F0EBDBBBBC7C75B4042E1D52878F@hog> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a-b.xyz; s=key1; t=1612886331; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=6t/dQUv8NVD7c4fyS8vRP02a7/2qwdY/gcuLsAO7W5k=; b=pEOJzAX0HDoRzXzl+JkjdiROeUC5RYaDAJ7FHpJ30aBzkgFMaNymmalCPKr7xC0MOcQ6Xy 9yckkdbpe6+9skbJQhlbdC5BV6ad0FHnOU7e6ezmtdYWS2k22DDvJD0W3UA5zXOGlWYPeo CaKjuqam0R/MUD13mKMQRnqJ51rBOffnm+JwW9By95sxWTZRG4duSypGFzQP9m3zfKmnOi q6moxQ5lVMY/MnUg7DLlTRpKODRklVt2yHUmaJFOS7ChVRLk+TlVtXDma3X/7K/slwElKL vkJDuFFbpt7uIaaBAKjFSxwAT89zUBni9R/NLOBUeVc94Pe5K3rEmaCQiHinyw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: 9front@9front.org Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:58:41 +0100 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: kvik@a-b.xyz In-Reply-To: <477917F0-25D1-481A-8CF7-F371554DF2E8@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kvik@a-b.xyz List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: agile object-oriented ActivityPub general-purpose CMS optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] transient dns errors cause smtp failure Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Stanley Lieber : > i cranked Maxreqtm to 30*1000 and it's already making a huge difference cleaning out the queue. we'll see how it plays out. I'm only now receiving this reply. The list may not be fast but at least it's steaming.