From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19390 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2022 05:36:26 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Aug 2022 05:36:26 -0000 Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com ([209.85.166.48]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 01:34:52 -0400 2022 Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so387716iod.3 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:34:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:from:to:cc; bh=vGn4PgJ8LD4niOqO1FFNpwNAnJ1Eprvvc5+I7kiebEA=; b=Kttqd9SbKrspFY/oEfC12+dBZF2ht4DysJ7gBR3xwSq7U4fBmTmdhoIXFoGqh9f09x B9sv7OqKsjnepyDl4QdiQCMLG49B6QHx3RAtafJlk4vms6HSJdjnk5SfVJM001VaN4H0 ZakzB/IIM/NUyHf5wd870tjE2T9MJGazIdKr6ESybdWynjTrbihUwL/Jz4CHOLI2i8OG E958nhmPEM8eKs3F+bsppF6PYlbIgUAkEEOcyjV2N/6BDGFHiUAV/SRAobCAzcCZngCw IeOu0+VyIeR3aie81c2THRpOeeowQk5pj2RBtrr0ic2o/by/oDXAeRLg3rnKgNUgws/H wWcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=vGn4PgJ8LD4niOqO1FFNpwNAnJ1Eprvvc5+I7kiebEA=; b=XKw+hs3QabYUDM6xhodes4WzWU4dl2Plf7L8IucJdItvYvbhDmOAFjIhZofEprE81l RQkg9UO+e+M1DeMy3j8MkmPlF4ezzGD9pitHBipj25Oykau7IZahnnqLNhFE8FpHOYOb xP2v5Myima4a5Ylz0jL0gVbJKGGmPwtXvtWhG3SqPMW3/kUtXK1F45Glt3XP07QsRt5G rIszeXh5hHzAqK9bB0E4wgTxyHZY8Ynf2sdprddqW2F+R2LL7qtAmCZY70Rm5yN4tujB SHqrirs4Hac97G4bgG55Dhpc8mDKSy8rzQWIx0CGdkNDJexQ+6H8NtV9NGSttUOfaVnj m8aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1MSISRdiXI75kG/DnVqqr04fzdhLSX9DoLx2np7x3nZOgJaoEu Rshwmu/j29BwwCHuSLsQLzHiTOsupYw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5tsxjAzqyvC4iklSiKhvACOCLglbAixUzxymLbxag7M/rQdvSYqo8NtGGqTaGkvBjeBtTWRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1c06:b0:346:5cfb:53f3 with SMTP id ca6-20020a0566381c0600b003465cfb53f3mr743461jab.23.1660800888546; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-184-39-205.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [67.184.39.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az25-20020a056638419900b003434a2bf0c8sm259234jab.102.2022.08.17.22.34.47 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:34:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Xiao-Yong Jin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Message-Id: <097C7F14-7AE8-4187-B043-C0BC164FE53B@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:34:47 -0500 To: 9front@9front.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: full-stack-oriented full-stack-oriented XML over HTML hosting hypervisor Subject: [9front] dangerous Exit menu item in sub-rio Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Right click in sub-rio now becomes quite dangerous, an accidental release of the right button when the mouse cursor is on the Exit menu item will destroy everything in that sub-rio. Consider this, every other menu item in that list requires you to use the mouse one more time to take an effect, except this Exit. The most dangerous item in the menu requires the least effort to trigger. Do we really need such convenience in destroying sub-rio? How often do you destroy the sub-rios? What's preventing using the parent rio's Delete menu item for this?