From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=5.0 tests=BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16094 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2021 00:29:26 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Jun 2021 00:29:26 -0000 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([91.121.223.63]) by 1ess; Tue Jun 8 20:24:11 -0400 2021 Message-ID: <0B00462D99BF898B2CA6C86FEB63B418@qak> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a-b.xyz; s=key1; t=1623198246; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=xzkZY/Ac864whadgZ62Ng6l/MzfJgbw0yehWRvgXB4Q=; b=nKQkVAlRL0GpjKaRDcAgMFEaqHtKV5paBMx1q5xos/EgPgkjkWOaX4ZU3aUFIw4SfkLVCG cTdhHbSJNAGO3QHvieM9Hxxh+0c8afDVXR5Z/QhoxH4TZCwDGQo4K+qbh8e/cKVe4fYHap drSCLw8OKUMcLjgl70cY+1jyGNzjlyQzsfGAoQd1M5dhJ58y/YC0zA4+Ri+DCEmuQ4M27i FlO5lfeP03KAHaGtJo8pTTZveOqsY6JZnMYxQ0DqVbgo33iTIvtXM2KZblUyThUecMZS93 sLEO5D+z3THFbKZqq6waOADor6Dw0gfDDsMmce+BdYcXlI8miUINM4YSluBw1w== To: 9front@9front.org Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 02:24:04 +0200 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: kvik@a-b.xyz In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kvik@a-b.xyz List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: metadata plugin firewall STM locator Subject: Re: [9front] Patch cc to create .$O files with DMTMP Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > Why do intermediate object files deserve special > treatment? When was the last time you went to pick up a $O file from the dump?