From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 21220 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2021 12:46:19 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Apr 2021 12:46:19 -0000 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]) by 1ess; Fri Apr 2 20:42:52 -0400 2021 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65AAC9BCD; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:41:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=sasl; bh=BOo1nMo1ajkSIuZI+iwwys1lWAY=; b=sAmCduZ/c6Nk5dl9EcfPOYWQ7NsH Bv6NjvG4X/m2TnuJljGXP59Z3aUB8y3tbBnd02haL/nyGir9JlO6w9bBipwkrpRB AD42+aVnPn9+2D1pUHR3mdzsb47RukNMKAcvd/sQq5jOsf+pNqhZMm0uKTXe5ylf qVKXgmCmsZjty+w= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E37CC9BCC; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:41:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (unknown [47.34.135.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC186C9BCB; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:41:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 00:41:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <035300018F7FF9B8637B516D75D94714@felloff.net> References: <035300018F7FF9B8637B516D75D94714@felloff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: 9front@9front.org,cinap_lenrek@felloff.net From: Romano Message-ID: <0BC2E42B-6AD8-4F23-883E-6235739503D6@cpan.org> X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 649830DC-9415-11EB-8691-D152C8D8090B-09620299!pb-smtp1.pobox.com List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: dependency rails replication rich-client database Subject: Re: [9front] Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On April 2, 2021 6:31:56 PM UTC, cinap_lenrek@felloff=2Enet wrote: >A quick follow up on the Pallocmem slots=2E > >I just eleminated the array in the last commit, as we can >caclculate the user page allocation from the conf=2Emem[] >array, so the xinit errors can be avoided completely=2E > >Can you confirm that this works on the macbook with >just increasing the conf=2Emem[] array size? I updated and built two ISOs, one with etherbcm added back in to pc64 and = one without=2E The one without bcm boots, but slightly less overall mem is = found, the difference being kernel data=2E Initial: 4009MB memory: 1688M kernel data, 2321M user, 2946M swap vs changeset 8390: 3928MB memory: 1607M kernel data, 2321M user, 2946M swap Both kmesgs are available at https://blog=2Efallglow=2Ecom/misc/mbpro The other ISO, in which I added back in etherbcm, causes the same machine = check error as before=2E