Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf)

[Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>]

On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be
>complaining about gmail...
>
>On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part:
>>>
>>>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>>       dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
>>>header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW;
>>>       spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net
>>>designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender)
>>>smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net;
>>>       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
>>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; Tue
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail
>>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough
>>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM).
>>>
>>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain
>>>> quarantine decision:
>>>>
>>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>>>        dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
>>>> header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW;
>>>>        spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net
>>>> designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender)
>>>> smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net;
>>>>        dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine should
>>>> not
>>>> apply
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Jonas Amoson <jonas.amoson@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200
>>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf)
>>>> To: 9front@9front.org
>>>>
>>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load
>>>> all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a
>>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes
>>>> the loading slow.
>>>>
>>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading
>>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe
>>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec).
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front
>>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load,
>>>> that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either.
>>>>
>>>> /Jonas
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today. hopefully gmail
>> will stop complaining once it propagates.
>>
>> sl
>>
>

you'll have to walk me through that. all i see is google demanding to see our papers.

sl