From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11029 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 23:46:07 -0000 Received: from mars2.inri.net (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 23:46:07 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 5 18:25:01 -0500 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([107.207.65.229]) by 5ess; Tue Jan 5 18:01:43 -0500 2021 Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:01:41 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> Message-ID: <0FAE354A-A6ED-428E-A9E2-E7D439E04499@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: template GPU module-scale optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be >complaining about gmail=2E=2E=2E > >On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part: >>> >>>Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; >>> dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmail=2E= com >>>header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; >>> spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri= =2Enet >>>designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >>>smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; >>> dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efrom= =3Dgmail=2Ecom >>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180=2Egoogle=2Ecom ([209=2E85=2E221=2E180]) by= 1ess; Tue >>> Jan >>> >>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM)=2E >>> >>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >>>> quarantine decision: >>>> >>>> Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; >>>> dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmail= =2Ecom >>>> header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; >>>> spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri= =2Enet >>>> designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >>>> smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; >>>> dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efr= om=3Dgmail=2Ecom >>>> >>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine shoul= d >>>> not >>>> apply >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Jonas Amoson >>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf= ) >>>> To: 9front@9front=2Eorg >>>> >>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to loa= d >>>> all the symbols from the binary=2E It is the process of checking if a >>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes >>>> the loading slow=2E >>>> >>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster)=2E Philippe >>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec)=2E >>>> >>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front >>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load= , >>>> that it matters=2E But it might be that it doesn't harm anything eith= er=2E >>>> >>>> /Jonas >>>> >>> >> >> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today=2E hopefully= gmail >> will stop complaining once it propagates=2E >> >> sl >> > you'll have to walk me through that=2E all i see is google demanding to se= e our papers=2E sl