From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BA223B50 for ; Fri, 10 May 2024 16:11:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Fri May 10 10:10:34 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1715350222; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4S59GMxnStsDppq1BC/6MdA0DYVLWCqfTjVC6k7DSUk=; b=TctRoBu0fNeshU/+vBboS2NQE/7MFEUsYxp6nuMbtLsNXShhy0N8Pp8TJUeq4Ype+XqznJ tB+vjPueI1Ce14IKuloLj6GpfIZHlJjURQrGuGG8A05zoF/GBVCVwS822fp5//RR97f16P 5sJNDN1E1EtO40wPZZUieUyeouF6vbM= Received: from [192.168.168.200] ( [207.45.82.38]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 951c2d59 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 10 May 2024 09:10:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <0d9b6e2e-54e9-4d9d-8579-c412c5458350@posixcafe.org> Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 09:10:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: <3d99344f-4075-4fb3-b22d-c91b37f46c3a@posixcafe.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: asynchronous scripting session SOAP over YAML template software Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] rio: resize border and scrollbar based on font Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 5/10/24 01:20, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 07:14:06PM -0500, Jacob Moody wrote: >> >> we do not currently do any sort of scaling in the UI for larger displays. >> I think we should be looking at a more general solution to this problem, > > scrollbars and borders should be arguments passed to rio and then > exposed in env or elsewhere > > every other attempt at 'general solutions' to ui scaling have been > miserable goddamn failures and I really really don't want to live > through it again > > khm Alright then where's you're code for a solution here? I don't want arguments to every fucking program for scaling.