From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 19099 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:31:35 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:31:35 -0000
Received: from invictus.wa.us.umbrellix.net ([45.76.244.95]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:26:30 -0400 2023
Received: (qmail 99060 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:26:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=umbrellix.net; s=umbrellix.net; x=1698722789; h=Message-ID:
	Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent:Reply-To:Subject:Content-Language:
	To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:
	Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=AZbnbpLo3m830C+Wag5M4LxHIU8=; b=nZ
	/95rg3aEx2tsf5R5wOfFVCarhX1ns0l2ca9A4G/3xL/GVbvnQc6HnNUbyNS+J6KZ
	hk+MfnIH0BiTEXpzFFltoTl6T86K5AqQLO4CAFJ5P8rO2fmxkYulgcOcJDU4XFlj
	9fS+WNtZF/lapK+mQ5BH7mrdZ8LevnQv8ogGBQrNs=
Received: from [10.5.1.92] (S01068c04ba9e4252.ca.shawcable.net [50.69.224.237])
	by postfix.invictus.wa.us.umbrellix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CFE877B61
	for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <0eaf2c03-0762-19bb-b6d8-64d4a3bd9648@umbrellix.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:26:30 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid>
 <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com>
 <fdc8de2c-0bd5-4604-81b4-918b6d6ff57f@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTcuCeLqAxbIw0x4@wopr>
 <e894585d-540a-4078-b0fc-fbc98ab0fefb@invalid.invalid>
 <ZTc3cq9kJeZMOt9z@wopr>
From: Ellenor Bjornsdottir <ellenor-9f@umbrellix.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZTc3cq9kJeZMOt9z@wopr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: mobile advanced full-stack singleton 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Doubling down on the accusations of theft, squirt?

On 10/24/23 03:18, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00:33PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
>> Okay:  it prevents batteries from being recognized as existing.  Works that
>> for you?
> No.  Include a link to sysinfo output from the affected machine.
>
>> I seen't what info'd be necessary.  Please clarify.
> Your English is as bad as your problem-solving capacity.
>
>> That accusation of theft seems to me completely out of left field. Where on
>> earth did you get it from?
> If only more people would ask you questions like that; whoever
> orignially bought that computer might still have it.
>
> khm

-- 
Ellenor Agnes Bjornsdottir (she)
sysadmin umbrellix.net
jabber: ellenor ~on~ umbrellix.net