From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4914 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2023 19:19:10 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Nov 2023 19:19:10 -0000
Received: from cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de ([89.1.8.211]) by 9front; Mon Nov 27 14:17:41 -0500 2023
Received: from cc-app3.netcologne.de (cc-app3.netcologne.de [89.1.9.192])
	by cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B877124F5
	for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 20:17:37 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de;
	s=nc1116a; t=1701112657;
	bh=lzusLuWkZZMZc67o7RWmQK/XgqfbD3dRTnYXaSrXuLw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From;
	b=Tt6L1/CdcmDfMOYOLduNnJmxKsk0K88gXaiju+T0Lkc0LYSqacS1+AKDBJ8dy5L8Q
	 4nuL4DDC57DDd8Kny1L9wiSC+dzG8slUCfv0XmtSXxLN0Ub+KStZTWafFIoMcH6JGn
	 PPWx/pl7E6sjMw5qNdYvL1+a3YXJpMVlxaczKTM9+f/0HvB691QsWnbxJV5YR+kK7t
	 FM//+/3Ngjl5OLdJclk6g54sYItOJ3wkSprXAZwITt1+LP1mpeZsw/XZn+ttTsySbR
	 NPWRNwnScydJ4dPYeI+Lw4AS/9jg4Qo/0sjLeCaVI0yl1KxEx6XJ/NP15P3CufSPic
	 EW9XXeXu2vvoQ==
Received: from cc-app3.netcologne.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cc-app3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 46C3711E1F
	for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 20:17:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 20:17:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Arne Meyer <meyer.arne83@netcologne.de>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <1016118562.2756816.1701112657222@comcenter.netcologne.de>
In-Reply-To: <5F4CACE5910AE9C5EE598E758406DBD0@felloff.net>
References: <129284489.2689159.1700948992100@comcenter.netcologne.de>
 <5F4CACE5910AE9C5EE598E758406DBD0@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev50
X-Originating-IP: 2001:4dd1:73f0:0:79e8:db8:d7cc:b850
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46C3711E1F
X-Spamd-Bar: -
X-Rspamd-Action: no action
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: cloud callback generator 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] ipv6 flow label support
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

After I did some more research I have to agree with you.
Flow labels seem to be badly broken, my patch should not go in and we should probably ignore the whole mess.
This sucks :(

> cinap_lenrek@felloff.net hat am 26.11.2023 14:28 CET geschrieben:
> 
> arne, is here any particular REASON why we should
> not just put ZERO in the flow-label field and pretend
> flow-labels dont exist?
> 
> this thing seems to have cause enougth damage to
> the ipv6 internet.
> 
> --
> cinap