From: ori@eigenstate.org
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] Thoughts on Wayland?
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 18:22:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128D5CB3B7D4B5B13DA12E39DB7DBF5@eigenstate.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13D04AA4-8C19-4B2A-990E-1F89EA8E614E@icloud.com>
Quoth David Leimbach <leimy2k@icloud.com>:
>
> >
> >>
> >> While it's theoretically possible to do mmap over 9p, it's not going to
> >> be a good experience.
>
> Is it substantially worse than mmap’ing over NFS? I can imagine a lot of panic or deadlock cases but…. Yeah that’s true for NFS also. At least a core dump.
>
I'm not familiar enough with the internals of the NFS
protocol to say for sure.
However, dont' just consider deadlock, consider coherence.
What happens if you put a mutex into shm, and two machines
try to lock it at the same time?
How do you avoid turning every single memory access into
a network round trip without some sort of sideband protocol?
What happens if a laptop participating in that coherence
mechanism gets its lid closed and hibernates for an hour or
three, and then comes back?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-04 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-04 19:26 Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 19:44 ` Stuart Morrow
2024-08-04 19:49 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 19:54 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-04 19:59 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-04 20:04 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-04 20:05 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-04 20:09 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 20:29 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-04 21:23 ` ori
2024-08-04 21:43 ` ori
2024-08-04 22:00 ` David Leimbach
2024-08-04 22:22 ` ori [this message]
2024-08-04 22:42 ` David Leimbach
2024-08-04 22:57 ` ori
2024-08-04 21:10 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 21:24 ` ori
2024-08-04 21:25 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-05 8:13 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-05 8:29 ` ori
2024-08-05 8:52 ` sirjofri
2024-08-05 8:57 ` Noam Preil
2024-08-05 9:12 ` sirjofri
2024-08-05 11:51 ` hiro
2024-08-05 9:03 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-05 11:05 ` Shawn Rutledge
2024-08-05 12:01 ` hiro
2024-08-05 12:26 ` sirjofri
2024-08-05 11:15 ` David Arnold
2024-08-05 11:47 ` hiro
2024-08-05 12:35 ` sirjofri
2024-08-04 20:01 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 21:23 ` sirjofri
2024-08-04 20:08 ` mkf9
2024-08-04 20:35 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-04 20:32 ` Pavel Renev
2024-08-04 21:31 ` ori
2024-08-05 6:09 ` Noam Preil
2024-08-05 8:02 ` hiro
2024-08-05 11:51 ` Shawn Rutledge
2024-08-06 16:37 ` hiro
2024-08-06 17:57 ` sirjofri
2024-08-07 9:27 ` Steve simon
2024-08-07 11:47 ` hiro
2024-08-05 12:54 ` Willow Liquorice
2024-08-05 13:13 ` [9front] Fortune worthy Steve simon
2024-08-05 20:06 ` [9front] Thoughts on Wayland? Jon Sharp
2024-08-06 0:07 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-06 0:09 ` Eli Cohen
2024-08-06 1:57 ` Michael Misch
2024-08-06 13:01 ` Emil Tomczyk
2024-08-04 22:27 ` Dave MacFarlane
2024-08-05 6:10 ` Noam Preil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1128D5CB3B7D4B5B13DA12E39DB7DBF5@eigenstate.org \
--to=ori@eigenstate.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).