From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB94521519 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:45:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de ([89.1.8.213]) by 9front; Tue Jun 11 07:41:09 -0400 2024 Received: from cc-app2.netcologne.de (cc-app2.netcologne.de [89.1.9.191]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3770012431 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:41:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1718106067; bh=QHmsGNuO1UzKitc/Mz4wYZNxUhGOizAPQavHYLqY6Js=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=Wn28wYpsQmGPWAdntPld1I0JV74FLQUbn8EbotJOBgV/3SEGy7DLKJx1G0PRfuz8d Jp+8MwR1P4bxRh9o8v5FOoktW1l5pEhNgtPo7lpLUK/vZ/PxUbK45Y9L+px6lYESvx YcHjpvtz/vZueVRDRsFGxiEmpvdJT9MvVNvWJpyfPLFCr3QFpFt/y0JCWWyaHNJqGL nMApSyoHBFkmtBtBCnHWsasxCeFayK9CANnQe08cVYaMu/oCA78tncKsc7Pt3rjLI8 /6wGLdls5b4XvMgddlhORgWcahxWc+Isib1VFomrmrwHnFNW8ZF6n8Dyymay6xZpqY QVNyiUvlQzUpA== Received: from cc-app2.netcologne.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cc-app2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0F21312130 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:41:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Arne Meyer To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: <118943016.2989132.1718106066975@comcenter.netcologne.de> In-Reply-To: References: <100769261.2962249.1718035785390@comcenter.netcologne.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev59 X-Originating-IP: 2001:4dd5:2796:0:2f4d:689c:b36d:ef7b X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0F21312130 X-Rspamd-Action: no action List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: base proxy-aware app Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] ip/ipconfig: don't add default routes for ipv6 prefixes with a validlt of 0 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk you're right, the fritzbox is not to blame. after sending my mail i found out there is rfc7084 which invalidates rfc6204 and then there is rfc9096 which annotates the former and describes this exact behavior. so it is to be expected from newer cpe routers.