From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.189.66 with SMTP id b42csp169743yhn; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 04:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARC7s-D_BBoEgwkDSg@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARC7s-D_BBoEgwkDSg@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.66.137 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.66.137; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARC7s-D_BBoEgwkDSg@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.66.137 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARC7s-D_BBoEgwkDSg@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARC7s-D_BBoEgwkDSg@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.66.137]) by 10.52.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr8223996vdt.14.1341659579217 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to:mime-version :x-mailer:in-reply-to:references:subject:date:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=dviMBYumZx8188KbwVHwx/907YyWXlvbQpECiNy99tw=; b=OVATo2XgHL24pOTn4zex80qu832566/t2NKsXEf0/ia2Q1ub30lyiuIpBv6agebmyr eiAolAp6WKUZpoOL80U/3upbC0/MumFZ4ivDN+NAABdwx+2sX1Vm0ghFTj7qSkCDTMG4 D4h9d4Z0tTgrd0MGUkQ+Yp0yUJ5j18vTNmPVs= Received: by 10.52.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr2037551vdt.14.1341659579144; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.230.4 with SMTP id jk4ls5466270vcb.4.gmail; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr26704694vdf.3.1341659578648; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.24.68 with SMTP id s4mr26704693vdf.3.1341659578638; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y20si3066872vdd.0.2012.07.07.04.12.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.25; Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521DA20CEE for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 07:12:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:12:58 -0400 Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 27AE54C0FF9; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 07:12:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1341659578.30781.140661098969033.19203867@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: XbROn3t0uVH4E5XBenhH7HeBOp5OK2bSFnqBpCzt0Cxt 1341659578 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: <2f037c006419e1d8bd59b7c496b85524@sp.inri.net> References: <2f037c006419e1d8bd59b7c496b85524@sp.inri.net> Subject: Re: mothra ignores
, funky text entry Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:12:58 +0100 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@fastmail.fm Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 08:36 PM, sl@9front.org wrote: > Have you verified that the forums in question are actually > presenting a
and not something else? Right. What it's not parsing correctly is
. It also doesn't parse
although it parses
correctly. Both errors can be seen at http://ethan.uk.to/static/brtest.html We must deal correctly with these trailing slashes because as any fine upstanding Web 2.0 shithead will tell you, any tag which does not have a corresponding closing tag must have a / at the end because otherwise html is simply too hard to parse. Ehh, regardless of what bollocks they use to justify it, the trailing slash seems to be required if you want to be taken seriously as a web designer, everybody uses it. There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them. -- George Orwell