From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4351 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 22:52:31 -0000 Received: from mars2.inri.net (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 22:52:31 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 5 17:35:01 -0500 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([107.207.65.229]) by 5ess; Tue Jan 5 17:16:31 -0500 2021 Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:16:28 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized lifecycle STM solution Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >i did not manage to quote the relevant part: > >Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; > dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmail=2Eco= m >header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; > spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2En= et >designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; > dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efrom= =3Dgmail=2Ecom >Received: from mail-vk1-f180=2Egoogle=2Ecom ([209=2E85=2E221=2E180]) by 1= ess; Tue Jan > >the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >by manually pressing NOT SPAM)=2E > >On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >> quarantine decision: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; >> dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmail=2E= com >> header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; >> spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri= =2Enet >> designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >> smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; >> dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efrom= =3Dgmail=2Ecom >> >> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine should = not >> apply >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jonas Amoson >> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) >> To: 9front@9front=2Eorg >> >> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load >> all the symbols from the binary=2E It is the process of checking if a >> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes >> the loading slow=2E >> >> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster)=2E Philippe >> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec)=2E >> >> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front >> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load, >> that it matters=2E But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either= =2E >> >> /Jonas >> > i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today=2E hopefully gm= ail will stop complaining once it propagates=2E sl