From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22528 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2022 17:54:20 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Nov 2022 17:54:20 -0000 Received: from cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de ([89.1.8.212]) by 9front; Fri Nov 11 12:52:20 -0500 2022 Received: from cc-app2.netcologne.de (cc-app2.netcologne.de [89.1.9.191]) by cc-smtpout2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B2F126B1 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:52:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1668189135; bh=LMqS30QX3Gt0LyqhQDR8YDLr++PEY0cqP7tAYzIX5zg=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=I2Ms711NPcoQ/Cd6gUMLY+vX+SWUSELCL2xMmKk61tRuae/kDRPZF5TueCgWhQ5ER fRHYpeptsGxDpVeiHq9iqr+05XHs68LCOWHHMH1QD/EJ+6WOZwQ8Hk07hdRmCUwfvp 4sMiqA06yIVXcXFMrXiHZCXwYazWPX5GXWRrpWReTTGYPQKLtUVNuMeNDGBAlQFgbJ oS4dj9/sz9rApwxRNJ92jEOzBJSUbteS+nskHlUsG5k4oDKFBZO+i6tqklPSaA482M XNysvBuiS1XwpaM/vlhsfA0oNgj1S17XgyXA3ZJLoz93FRLyZEQxO5QD/rmSXeNtq0 rp5xPToHtcDmQ== Received: from cc-app2.netcologne.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cc-app2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BCB3E11E7A for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:52:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:52:14 +0100 (CET) From: Arne Meyer To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: <1453278421.4596864.1668189134709@comcenter.netcologne.de> In-Reply-To: <6c58605e-7b25-1adc-3681-41df77e4ae91@posixcafe.org> References: <2110680159.4595621.1668187065209@comcenter.netcologne.de> <6c58605e-7b25-1adc-3681-41df77e4ae91@posixcafe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev16 X-Originating-IP: 2001:4dd6:4f82:0:871:1bcd:1671:77e4 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BCB3E11E7A X-Spamd-Bar: - List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: agile advanced ORM over WEB2.0 hosting pipelining framework Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] skelfs: remove useless code Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk After that patch I grepped through /sys/src/cmd/* and found a more hits. Is there any difference between handrolled emalloc implementations and emalloc9p? If not, I can go spelunking to replace emalloc where emalloc9p is available. > Jacob Moody hat am 11.11.2022 17:37 GMT geschrieben: > > > On 11/11/22 10:17, Arne Meyer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > if I read the code correctly emalloc9p already checks for failed allocations and zeroes the memory, so the following code is redundant. > > > > Greetings, > > Arne > > You are correct, muscle memory did not work in my favor this time. > > Thanks! > moody