From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by ewsd; Tue Dec 11 16:24:10 EST 2018 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7309F218B7 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:24:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:references; s=fm1; bh=Rcz O0xKa+JQdd+4gGxBz7YIQpm0cCEKs407LOXo8vQo=; b=S/8oumng7WhCZifw2W4 DYeRQMGe/+58FH2T68HOrhQm5m2RM12bPYsy3Lxko/LLjL05rfacC8Dk3HhzPaME aSY/06PJhPO2u4xJ+9Lw/U3jjOf+QY1Amp9iRp6t5mEliaaEZVuQQwg92taAquM8 2HphzZ7GQnei9DyM7d7og9QSrzHFjCdAmCyovWnYkqDxmtG5IAlDtmKvuNEOZ8vH EvhMLNuCS37IBUy7LyJAAGYuTRlADpKfXTrJ+P/DZVyQSX2rqSbxLFrfUKzcsmVU s1Sxp10XNbeWNhy4apwU8p45wc+xHJvVCbMCpusZHqRwmTysCmwus3cQDK9oxqCy u1A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RczO0xKa+JQdd+4gGxBz7YIQpm0cCEKs407LOXo8v Qo=; b=d0IyXI0qyTU8B5ZWdjZDEGC4nxdHASFwhi9qCrfdv6fX4J09G1nLQvVTV ZRxOQ+Aa5cloQ9WmRcmjHRaEGEVAIzaZ8Sb2jWpWXdHQFZSQ+mUDw9CCKe65X1pp PcjOaADIGHkXtg7Xpk31OdEX6fuMwv0LrepAlmHV8JuQELLr8Yt1HQlEhe+PEGy0 jaISzIyipO9CIQd8gW2/o0APf9JPVfVkUQVAfRZS4KKQ3LEXdx+uquh+Rk+JLxgc 1D6P5LBgD9meomN7OxYZIEEjrDwlM2snKYzOZ2Qm1uhM3aIDUhvcm408u70yltC8 3lTeDFliaCVXPFGY+eCX9iqd5ixog== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudegjedgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecu fedttdenucenucfjughrpefkhffvggfgtgfoufffjghfsehtjeertdertdejnecuhfhroh hmpefgthhhrghnucfirghruggvnhgvrhcuoegvvghkvggvheejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdr fhhmqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkhgvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlrdhfmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1FAD36229D; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:24:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1544563447.3391078.1606328000.5E4529D9@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Ethan Gardener To: 9front@9front.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2f590f9a Subject: Re: [9front] rio exit menu Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:24:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <6CFCF27E92A504A165B945790864E88F@kvik.link> References: <6CFCF27E92A504A165B945790864E88F@kvik.link> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: agile module-aware callback browser On Sun, Dec 9, 2018, at 9:38 PM, kvik wrote: > I find it useful to have an "Exit" menu entry, sometimes. > An opt-in option seems reasonable. I implemented rio exit with confirmation in exactly the same way as mothra; same "ok?" icon and everything. Does this sound good? If so, I'll update my patch, health permitting.