Re: [SPAM] Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes

[Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm>]

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, at 8:49 AM, qwx wrote:
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>                             [score: 0.0000]
>  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP            Message was received from an IP address
>  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
>                             [77.136.38.132 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
>  1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
>                             bl.spamcop.net
>                [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?77.136.38.132>]
>  0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
>                             [77.136.38.132 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
>  3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
>  1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
>                             https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
>                             [77.136.38.132 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
>  1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
>                             dynamic-looking rDNS
>  2.1 NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN    No From name + hostname using IP address
> 
> 
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + Re: [9front] ThinkPad X250 screen blanks against my wishes
>   1k (message/rfc822)

I can understand the lists because 9front-bugs accepted all spam for a while, but "No From name" makes no sense. Oh... unless they mean the From field contains only an email address.  That's ridiculous, all spam comes with a full name in From.  (That's how you know it's spam. *trollface*)  The IP address parts are outside my comprehension.

-- 
2.1.3. Life with eternal upgrades