Re: [9front] drawterm stuck

[Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net>]

re: httpd is slow

i think this is a little unfair.

i’m sure httpd would not stand up well to heavy loads - it wasn’t been designed for super high performance.

However i would expect it to keep up fairly well with light loads, after all it doesn't try to do too much.

imho file server performance is likely to effect it more.

-Steve


> On 15 Jul 2020, at 10:16 am, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> if you don't know how to do networking with qemu some people like to
> use the libvirt abstraction around it that tries to do most of these
> things for you (more like vbox).
> 
> personally i think it's better to learn how to do the networking right
> with bridges and IP forwarding instead of silly hacks like NAT or port
> forwarding.
> qemu doesn't really need to do much here, the bridging or IP routing
> would need to happen on the outer OS.
> 
> httpd is slow, but for controversial pages that might be fine as
> you'll have less visitors.
> all that benchmarks would show is that httpd is slow, so i don't why
> you want benchmarks.
> i recommend rc-httpd, it's slower than httpd. it's really good.
> 
>> On 7/15/20, William Gunnells <gunnells@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Okay I got it to work in virtual box. I struggled with qemu and tap/bridge
>> to no end.
>> 
>> I remember that virtual box handled bridge a little differently. So I gave
>> it a shot and boom up and running.
>> 
>> I do have OpenBSD on my laptop perhaps I can qemu working with tap and
>> bridge.  But honestly I’m not sure what I want to do
>> in the grand scheme of things.
>> 
>> I think it would have worked without the bridge but the qemu string would
>> have been long because I think I needed to open up a range of ports for
>> ingress and egress.
>> 
>> Thanks for all the help
>> 
>> Does httpd work and is it fast I was thinking of running this in AWS on a
>> custom AMI at some point
>> 
>> Just looking for something different and something that could potentially be
>> fast. I plan on serving controversial pages.
>> 
>> Its just hard to find bench marks but more importantly I didn’t want this to
>> be the usual nix distributions.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Jul 13, 2020, at 5:25 PM, Amavect <amavect@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> oh my net audit show everything seems to be fine except
>>>> ether=3D525400123456 does not belong to any network interface
>>>> no fs=3D entry  (needed for pls boot)=20
>>> Refer to my example from my last message and modify to your own setup.
>>> You have duplicate sys=cirno lines, the cpu= line is not a '=', and your
>>> dom should be 9front, not cirno.9front.
>>> Your ipgw and dns is your router's ip address, which is probably 10.0.2.1
>>> No fs is fine if you're not planning to need tls boot.
>>> 
>>>> auth server seems to be fine i think it reads
>>>> someone is listening on port 567
>>> That's good. The cpu server is trying to listen for connections.
>>> Clearly not succeeding, though.
>>> 
>>>> auth/asaudit shows 1 problem
>>>> BAD: key in keyfs does not match nvram
>>>> trying nvram key for 9front@glenda with factotum
>>>> GOOD: key in factotum matches nvram
>>> I'm guessing you didn't set up glenda's password with auth/changeuser
>>> Or, if you did, the key didn't match. Run auth/wrkey again.
>>> Refer to the fqa links that I had put in my last message.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amavect
>> 
>>