From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 15085 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2021 21:55:45 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Aug 2021 21:55:45 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 1ess; Tue Aug 24 17:49:48 -0400 2021
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1629841779;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=so32L2HhYE9BMeFTFAxdpgGfHiCp1UMqNPCxwXX34qk=;
	b=CZEmk/DLCc3+4GgYDtl9ZdF39NB67xnPOr3QMjgUPiuywL14F/2oXwawMoJMNDzXWG/fWt
	G1zTM4xxDGMJj5Z58IwaTrHXpv1tQyr5sc4J3iRtpYjyq3XBpEFgVn23guI2D8ImT6AbZk
	bn3P+EvHgEXOPWs3Sv65TqXzIinMA24=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e25a5cc (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <15CD9AD70DBA6E3C24956FD65F4CF2AD@wopr.sciops.net>
From: qwx <qwx@sciops.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:49:37 +0200
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO_LUq8oUn1paedBA-5Z2F8Fb2wNEErB01LhaxtFAsfgwg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: leveraged CSS-aware out-scaling core proxy 
Subject: Re: [9front] Re: man pages
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

I pushed part of your changes.  Some I rejected on my own
accord.  My earlier point stands, there are many more
instances of UTF and other shit that you didn't touch.
Moreover, if we do this for `UTF', why not `HTML' or `USB'
or whatever?

Thanks for bumping this, and any further changes are
welcome.

> Oh yes, there are.  What comes to mind immediately is citation style 
> and handling of options in SYNOPSIS (sometimes all are listed and 
> sometimes there is just “[options]”), as well as just bad troff.  
> There are some checks for bad stuff (see for example `mk punccheck` in 
> /sys/man).
> 
> -- 
> Humm

As always, patches welcome.

Thanks,

qwx