From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B284B26B81 for ; Fri, 10 May 2024 15:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com ([209.85.167.44]) by 9front; Fri May 10 09:27:58 -0400 2024 Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-51f1b378ca5so3596598e87.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 10 May 2024 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715347672; x=1715952472; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CPalou8fBE1tGTDEBDiWwjKAE25i1MV7UZqSUT4657o=; b=hzPcQUJYAOMDdEKilqYBAtA6YkJuRpyjsXCaNC8+WLoTkd+6jt0RM0WHjp3ANlCgac p6oQi1Gs54c9qIzySC6vMC9hL8kKgHtrVG9EjOPdiWs8hguwAdE6D5AEGR77Bhz0gxyC qI8JvMMyPDtMqPM3WOhohA4nuDBMHrR/U0SEvr0WftSmLl3EiZ82iKch23S0ZMY4HMWD Lih60Cyy/ajC6riYyqkpTNrlzsimUAPzE8rvkdDWnlPkIun8AEiQsSFj8kbZWlNlO5Zi cbqEZ+vCt6tofcKG9BeEM/vnKjx7nqfp3hEpHNEPmHVfqfArK+GISKnms4OHK5dmhKF/ PB5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715347672; x=1715952472; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CPalou8fBE1tGTDEBDiWwjKAE25i1MV7UZqSUT4657o=; b=oZUm1s12D5Bqdwk+CzUw1+pNgL6UTnUDnOj90YzqqfIen/AGrhUW4VLyugelx1MkoT Wwtwrm5xdoGAHUU/MVdXyRElSWQKFFTijj9rC9bw8X5WBpUJsBPNvMQuyhU40DCpd8R7 qrhFMZJ9Ml6eXMBzN+ngjDgloyNybjxmy6Xvxs4XI13hLWaIFFIEROCnOnpH85uh2+Sx MioovfAguK/VUVu2FLVKvHhDC9OOzPT8ZT0b4caxoPyRiDKlidbNhPebyVPEfk6/RggW 82xeIgaMxMR5S611f+m2/J5rxAWuf3L+ER/nPSeqUh56lZMXPQg87HNQsvLPhWurRsxd eV8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwfT6DupczjJ+USTyWEtUboj8wV4JkKE0782xMiurMrFVqaa6i2 dEjR/NhN7CCbtqYzkXocGEXi+p8i4gZt/xGmRiqfHzs+VplIBQPVauhUJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE2vW5kW5mMVGKre9VGi2RBRFxsrHxUJixMyJpcQjdnEkxWWbYe4RHkTjUGay+H/v06uWHEvg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b01:0:b0:516:c44a:657d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-522104757d5mr2087650e87.64.1715347671497; Fri, 10 May 2024 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:14ba:6859:ad00:89d:af4b:9c8a:634f? (dqbp66yykx23z3jfmpqjt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi. [2001:14ba:6859:ad00:89d:af4b:9c8a:634f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-521f35ba76esm698071e87.89.2024.05.10.06.27.50 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 May 2024 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1626b2be-8b05-45cc-9266-bb7a4f6b7076@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:27:50 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: <86F1A5CD218EFDC622FF2D79D79DD44D@smtp.pobox.com> From: Kristo In-Reply-To: <86F1A5CD218EFDC622FF2D79D79DD44D@smtp.pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic shared high-performance-scale control Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] rio: resize border and scrollbar based on font Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10.5.2024 9.13, Romano wrote: > I also can't imagine trying to go through all programs to see which > rely on a specific rio border-width. Rio was probably the first 9 program that I ever hacked on and I do recall that modifying the border size did unfortunately mess up some programs. If I had to guess now I'd say it was mothra. A lot of code has changed since then though, sorry I don't have a machine to test with at the moment. Kristo