From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]) by ttr; Wed May 29 09:58:22 EDT 2013
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j11so2217378qag.9
        for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 06:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to
         :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
        bh=N+T4+MUoccAt0TSrj5xhc6TozEHYCB+/0YhpX8kbEyU=;
        b=0eA2cQkvJpyk7VWWz94pi8aHZTbeNNsqTOghX8VEz1iVQkl8XPOqo8+WkIauf4l1qR
         3G1MuqZoG3lzxCT8CebhRyoJR1wrg9CAmS0jkb3maWzRhm9QuNSZjdj9RfPWdu1Xy1N4
         wLkIBD2up5uw6EsqtCIX56uPx+8Sg90HEO7OXFQF6elq+FZuWCXd8f3+QfGFUY13Xf+B
         8E5CIk/XrE8RDXrPQmuzam6n2dwI+Te8fVZpCB2yh1mb66tXJbrWeAjzLw9bFO+cPm4+
         P/JVm2KB+CJfcBVfVdQ0ynJ21xjpQnDmu1bBBKE2z/ZcTq7ppJOoeH5DdIDRdhWPLBGz
         gjQA==
X-Received: by 10.229.76.80 with SMTP id b16mr1062133qck.19.1369835900965;
        Wed, 29 May 2013 06:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <mveety@gmail.com>
Received: from [10.161.156.250] (91.sub-70-192-133.myvzw.com. [70.192.133.91])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm31803474qav.1.2013.05.29.06.58.19
        for <9front@9front.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 29 May 2013 06:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [9front] errors while installing large contrib packages
References: <66701e9a135d684fe38e23071277ce44@9.offblast.org>
From: Matthew Veety <mveety@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350)
In-Reply-To: <66701e9a135d684fe38e23071277ce44@9.offblast.org>
Message-Id: <16CEA707-2898-4CA6-9A27-4036CF20887D@gmail.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
X-Bullshit: advanced encrypted realtime-java polling rails strategy
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:58:09 -0400
To: "9front@9front.org" <9front@9front.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

On May 29, 2013, at 9:39, mischief@9.offblast.org wrote:

> it would appear the problem goes away when i run ramfs before contrib/inst=
all on a large package.
>=20
> can anyone else confirm this?
>=20
> mischief

I can confirm this. Should ramfs be mounted by default on /tmp?=20=