From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 23841 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2021 21:12:33 -0000
Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Nov 2021 21:12:33 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 4ess; Tue Nov  2 16:40:16 -0400 2021
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1635885588;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=AWJPGaEICuP7R2zHJUKDlxEOausczuaaYSrqBALqsWw=;
	b=10tedhRV0mD89v4fJECBu7UugEfZY6Zg3wEiub5csQqQIEj5z4k3JWaLhsk7I78Nizvgyb
	S2oZSCohZsZwrMbNx/Ym+cQ8+Dm49mZH4KwybfxrC2Vo4nkh2ERxvcYX536dnJr2xDmqWZ
	4Hbwi31/onFbnhdjqEFjNhwVYUGlw6M=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90a022ed (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <19838337F284DA6EC557AD4AB1263AB2@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 21:39:46 +0100
From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO-bFg2x-ARKqXyn2Yi-heUHwG63_76KVVemioNos8o5gQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: generic reduce/map database polling database 
Subject: Re: [9front] mainly just spelling and typos
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue Nov  2 21:28:43 +0100 2021, morrow.stuart@gmail.com wrote:
> On 01/11/2021, qwx@sciops.net <qwx@sciops.net> wrote:
> > - ps(1): I don't understand the point of the first part, it looked
> >   just fine to me
> 
> "No memory: waiting for more of a critical memory" reads right to you?
> (I don't actually know what forms "no [resource]" can take - but I
> can't see why this (made-up) example wouldn't still be
> representative.)

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the purpose of this line is to
convey what a process state of this type would indicate and it seems
clear to me as is.  imho this is a non-issue.

Thanks,
qwx