From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cmo-0002.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.171]) by ewsd; Sat Sep 28 21:17:44 EDT 2019 Received: from cmr-0001.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.118]) by cmo with ESMTP id ENjhiMbKqcCQrENqIijUdo; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:17:42 +0900 Received: from pi3L.jitaku.localdomain ([112.71.198.68]) by cmr with ESMTPA id ENqIil5oJR1qgENqIikdxL; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:17:42 +0900 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hera.eonet.ne.jp; s=x01; t=1569719862; i=kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp; bh=7qc1FQo7ZtmhDFaFaEXKGVvAxv+k3aAmI+dHIHURNBw=; h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To; b=eJbXf7zTIBbe+Addv/kz4d+ZEzbDb+7ijXLPBniZjpalY361AOW2hD3Ir9D1l2z8Y zByV7E6KAAML0glnNd60iJx6V6ds9p/AgQY0u3R+PfKFftIKaH1mypPnuGMqBKpPIk E8VRkojq2vWdZgMtIWxqZP5YvssaF27D5DMMNNGV0BBTqFaN/EI91LEDJCWghQgjRV KVzTiE2XQPt7GjPbubT5PKhDmGtIBgCE9UzAP16MQHmOaHgXXRHtIhvtvWxQsbkPc/ 2D3fz3sN4PAfo8/znVOBXfFJhLl5UU4axm2EqjzNvzYnaOEx7+Iwv0eVP75Q0/zf/4 IoDOjLlavYNgA== Message-ID: <1D1ADEFC49EB3E8397B352B58ED30A7C@hera.eonet.ne.jp> To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] unofficial sdcard image for raspberry pi 4 testing Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:17:39 +0900 From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp In-Reply-To: CAFSF3XNjJ9KqqcuGGic6ciNv+K8t2KbM-hD0EiWVVEcQvbX_yg@mail.gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-gekedgearqoepdyekcrhmuykwg" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: optimized open-source lifecycle general-purpose out-scaling optimizer This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-gekedgearqoepdyekcrhmuykwg Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks all. Regarding rpi4, I may not hurry to get it, because I'm using rpi only for terminals. 1GB memory may be enough for that purpose. However, I found rpi4 has independent ether interface from usb (Sorry just a glance of souces), which may be better for usb itself ether... Do you all think to to use rpi4 for cpu/auth/file server for plan9? Kenji --upas-gekedgearqoepdyekcrhmuykwg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: 9front-bounces@ewsd.inri.net Received: from cmi-0002.m.xspmail.jp (LHLO cmi-0002.xspmail.jp) (100.120.21.3) by zmbs-0041.m.xspmail.jp with LMTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 08:36:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from ewsd.inri.net ([107.191.116.128]) by cmi with ESMTP id EMGCiuACMgZccEMGCiGeKz; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 08:36:21 +0900 X-Country-Code: US Authentication-Results: cmi-0002.xspmail.jp; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.b=ZiB8Zrtw; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; x-token-a=pass; x-token-b=pass Received-SPF: PASS identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="9front-bounces@ewsd.inri.net" Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]) by ewsd; Sat Sep 28 19:35:52 EDT 2019 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id f22so8982408wmc.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:35:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fcCplSKWqkTeHizwz1Ka+KTqGmsjp0mJ+CqZQPYrbYc=; b=ZiB8Zrtw1stGrzac5fUE84HU6kGfk9Ij/0PRbEn0osOL5M5OZv58s3u5F5FpxTAsI7 iaIEPOlN4PDBT/vhlzGqtRRkVVUwVYFyYR9rsDBI0j1EiLZOLe1Uml0tjns06KX3K/1o EE7LVlhgvveaWXhJ0/R2a/SQouAhBoHOXupOiWEErOL8lSMtR032R2pfS6gg5SS2k6Vi SbBUUFMVYqCOMtUtYe2rfW/hZnV/Lpj+4XZ0bXlWjxoEWqv1CDSia0NvneLRFW7EX61B mY6CZiwyZ/qco7LbNmLvZBrnjJhwVTR5bLvO3Y9BAvFxePeyOHUXqXlhJyaCqgYmYvA0 V5BQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fcCplSKWqkTeHizwz1Ka+KTqGmsjp0mJ+CqZQPYrbYc=; b=YJWCCgCMeiMqjeLxpNGgDzsxd4iDWvYALbHPLeoNm+ApOvIY2g7Sef3slrf2FTGB1t A3TxCDcQgnGeF5qmGNCKUyP7Luv5w5MUyzE1CGiOqIrS09lizuKq1KQk2Zrf2UkvfYCD H9NeiehbTph18oNvC1WFE/vXCXSrHUPh8cQegP2wHec0iOBOWBKv5J3wmlx2NAQ2sDAJ X53wTJDC3TPAjVWNO3OEJcm35/holar+pYgPdvz/I2JA9Tf8+Go3H8VyZ7iJVkYEdDUl mVgTqn0pDZcPMYvAwsesrMI2B33ptu+lf0xgt/vO4OrXXEDkLeh5UFFCNo+Ebn7S4wbD hoJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+1ak4di2UfYyoY7zoJXkHIGzb9S1zcLHOxTPKIfS+R4/orJlI U+4VcbgFvISkczIL0QZtarlduOpokbA7fVe1z4Q3Bg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfysIwIKxnm9AGmG3ntZe/UWbNpSTOt0K8ugcNJZw3hLV0hANtQgQVIz+gD9SHErxboD206riQbFaAhbE0zt8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:389:: with SMTP id w9mr11657915wmd.139.1569713748270; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:35:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a5d:45d0:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 16:35:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 01:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: webscale table property-based database Subject: Re: [9front] unofficial sdcard image for raspberry pi 4 testing Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk probably mothra stuff is mostly latency bound and not really that intensive in terms of computations or bandwidths. cinap was reporting that the rpi4 was significantly faster, i didn't know the rpi3 was noteworthy in that regard. --upas-gekedgearqoepdyekcrhmuykwg--