From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9602CEAF for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 22:52:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrv.se ([45.76.35.157]) by 9front; Thu Aug 22 16:51:55 -0400 2024 Message-ID: <1EDF1C4B5C58DA4F532F439A14D0C2E7@ftrv.se> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftrv.se; s=mail2; t=1724359913; bh=pNZEBau6FKz8MSVFY+iQgZcmIJN0QEE5+9THqL7BYVk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=kvUnuhgr3oIUA/0uIbwlVwj1VxHrGh3OivT4yLvt7iV7BO/lBXtXAZdMwoNMpvY3g /5E13dO6MhNLQrVE3r8jdI9Hae3zZpI4N/PAt8+XdPl2fn38PIoXWJJlBwNKPWgJNW FRsYOqs+zn0+3X2kdudlU9KrvOJiZDBh1Sq/TRtqo1WlfazpwALFtiqyLs1SoO9Est puLtoXF4s1rtqws3wWzYJpsRcaGsxWmVvfmM7kyMVAvpgJ8AGqUiRD01AdQymMe4E2 XERgYabxuwIEPe0Yik0lsWf9fqpK0L87J4X8RWbyvvp0TYRfQpLaFy1h0PPxJ8vB9D 56s5v/EClSEsA== Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 22:51:51 +0200 From: =?utf-8?q?Sigrid_Solveig_Hafl=C3=ADnud=C3=B3ttir?= To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: anonymous rails controller Subject: Re: [9front] Drawterm patch -- build on latest OpenBSD/PPC Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk I will say it again - tas.c per platform should not exist. What gcc/clang have as builtins should be enough to do a portable version that doesn't end up broken for whatever reason. Jon, if you can test __atomic_test_and_set approach of arm64 on ppc and tell us if it works, that'd be great. We can remove the platform-specific implementations and keep just one C file instead.