From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24076 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2022 22:52:50 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Oct 2022 22:52:50 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Sat Oct 15 18:51:44 -0400 2022 Received: from abbatoir (pool-108-27-53-161.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [108.27.53.161]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e795041 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1EF8A86A00D25533360A8B6BA1E39291@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 18:51:40 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: private patented metadata markup Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] hget: file name detection Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Alex Musolino : > > It’s not that they file but that file you write to disk has the query string in the name. > > Sorry. It’s not that they *fail* but that *the* file you write to disk has the query string in the name. take a look at RFC6266 for the filename param; we should probably use that if it is present.