From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by 10.236.50.47 with SMTP id y35csp256366yhb;
        Tue, 8 May 2012 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhClyaX9BBoEcidqtw@googlegroups.com>
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhClyaX9BBoEcidqtw@googlegroups.com designates 10.224.182.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.182.14;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhClyaX9BBoEcidqtw@googlegroups.com designates 10.224.182.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhClyaX9BBoEcidqtw@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhClyaX9BBoEcidqtw@googlegroups.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.182.14])
        by 10.224.182.14 with SMTP id ca14mr105241qab.17.1336501413143 (num_hops = 1);
        Tue, 08 May 2012 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:to:subject
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=WbOo0DZN3qQtDIUib2zTAayrnj02UzwYMcuifJOu8qE=;
        b=pPQ745GqenUHfxmgDS2Q5rPOVgSD4AtS+vBjPa3ygTiPcg8iLeNoHtPMhdEMXPlaEb
         klET48hpa317+WInWX/zTAS5bEP1/GJN6sw5zkgCY+yl7CsHD7+XHi/cmuLpJzhF7Amt
         etP363J3l36J6OH/pL7JieIUOcDfNaJ5eITaY=
Received: by 10.224.182.14 with SMTP id ca14mr17190qab.17.1336501413081;
        Tue, 08 May 2012 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.33.13 with SMTP id f13ls95367qad.1.gmail; Tue, 08 May 2012
 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.76.208 with SMTP id d16mr83717qak.5.1336501412221;
        Tue, 08 May 2012 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.76.208 with SMTP id d16mr83716qak.5.1336501412197;
        Tue, 08 May 2012 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sp.nv ([68.179.132.47])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id a39si25431qch.0.2012.05.08.11.23.31;
        Tue, 08 May 2012 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of sl@9front.org) client-ip=68.179.132.47;
Message-ID: <1c581e53ec2520d4989053955c2ef15b@sp.inri.net>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 18:23:29 +0000
From: sl@9front.org
To: 9front@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: /dev/wsys/*/screen not present for nested rio?
In-Reply-To: <7aa15ef5-85aa-4021-957c-aec99af937dd@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: sl@9front.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
 of sl@9front.org) smtp.mail=sl@9front.org
Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/9front/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:9front@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:9front+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/9front?hl=en_US>
Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/9front/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:9front+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/9front/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+831096995978+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

>> And from within a nested rio:
>>
>>         term% file /dev/wsys/1/screen
>>         /dev/wsys/1/screen: plan 9 image, depth 32
>
> Here I get /dev/wsys/1/screen does not exist.
> If I type ls /dev/wsys then it shows
> /dev/wsys/1

Interesting. I do run a slightly modified rio, but it's not clear to me
that the modifications should cause it to behave differently in this
instance. My rio is here:

http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/pkg/386/hjrio-2012.04.17.tbz


> (Also this commit went in, that does not expose the screen any more in
> nested rios.)

I haven't advanced my rio to this commit, yet.

-sl