From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.110.2 with SMTP id t2cs182378yhg; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARC_0YryBBoEOtSsVw@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARC_0YryBBoEOtSsVw@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.202.139 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.202.139; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARC_0YryBBoEOtSsVw@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.202.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARC_0YryBBoEOtSsVw@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARC_0YryBBoEOtSsVw@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.202.139]) by 10.220.202.139 with SMTP id fe11mr4471041vcb.28.1312991428409 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X9MxrdnWRLpT6nNzvoskBG2FRXpjZ0vgM3K6mqAUllw=; b=MX+cqUVXdVLpQk1uUvKFrvgKvWZBGm1pWefDs0Xkz0pgXV5xIkw890g9HPLS0g5Tgv b0rY487RWjUFcMD1Qibd49lYa7JsbTTavwefLDhwzf6lNAqNaE0Dg+7ZE3swQTxg1JX3 As/NUnbHPP1xN22pFAOy7uvuvZc1QgYIXyFTc= Received: by 10.220.202.139 with SMTP id fe11mr1389598vcb.28.1312991423219; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.24.163 with SMTP id v3ls840512vdf.3.gmail; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.130 with SMTP id iy2mr319674vdb.1.1312991422583; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.130 with SMTP id iy2mr319673vdb.1.1312991422575; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2si1413051vdv.2.2011.08.10.08.50.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.27; Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA53210F6 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:50:21 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: FM9f5IirYjrBiNksICAP7jvQasgIjIF035tVob5EHNfd 1312991420 Received: from kolari.ethans.dre.am (cpc5-lanc4-0-0-cust349.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com [81.102.241.94]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ABFFE45C517 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:50:19 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: DDE - interesting or horrible? Message-ID: <20110810165019.2f314e40@kolari.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: References: <46695c2a8a380218741fff083f2efa27@quintile.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:50:49 +0200 cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > works fine here. maybe its the 24 bit alpha bug? 9front > has the patches. how does it fail? Renders fine here too, labs & 9front. My copy of the labs distro runs in 9vx. 9front was tried on the hardware (1024x768x32 VESA) and via cpu(1) from the labs 9vx. Neither system is quite up to date, with the labs install being a few months old.