From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.110.2 with SMTP id t2cs221297yhg; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARCHkY_yBBoEhjjuTQ@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARCHkY_yBBoEhjjuTQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.116.77 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.116.77; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARCHkY_yBBoEhjjuTQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.116.77 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARCHkY_yBBoEhjjuTQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARCHkY_yBBoEhjjuTQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.116.77]) by 10.220.116.77 with SMTP id l13mr599941vcq.58.1313065100484 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PF5RP0d4fMK4Ayznx8L6L+j4l7cwQM/ejQ4TUkbJAx0=; b=cduMjvpnmnGlp/c5ilt13UV9oKxfhscRgSmQ/3P84UZwYvCe2K5dah6t6RCG1AZ4VL EjR3MTca3BInXibEGbgRLhGd5Q16l6lppK6To3WoZthCdTGqYSz6L+vP6a+wK4TS6Bi7 Z8OBtkr+T/AopyHd/s7+MhJPf3+qQ6OiR9X3U= Received: by 10.220.116.77 with SMTP id l13mr187056vcq.58.1313065095517; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.73.194 with SMTP id n2ls1813464vdv.2.gmail; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.27.35 with SMTP id q3mr787280vdg.30.1313065094999; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.27.35 with SMTP id q3mr787279vdg.30.1313065094989; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2si2558693vdv.0.2011.08.11.05.18.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.27; Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60A520941 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:18:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:18:13 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: J8RhcdgK89M4yvXXR8xTsIuUkTLxoNa5iuak69OqpG3d 1313065093 Received: from kolari.ethans.dre.am (cpc5-lanc4-0-0-cust349.3-3.cable.virginmedia.com [81.102.241.94]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 083A441AF07 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:18:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:18:10 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: DDE - interesting or horrible? Message-ID: <20110811131810.515e0733@kolari.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: References: <46695c2a8a380218741fff083f2efa27@quintile.net> <20110810165019.2f314e40@kolari.ethans.dre.am> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:25:02 +0200 yy wrote: > The patch was applied in 9vx, but not in the labs' Plan 9. It was > submitted by Erik, but it was rejected because the plan was to use > p9p's libmemdraw, but that has not happened. See: > http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/patch/sorry/memdraw32bit/notes A timely reminder of why I chose to support 9front! haha... So, what are we going to do about it? I'm busy this week or I'd at least try to apply the patch.