From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.168.8 with SMTP id j8csp79872yhl; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARCKwuj7BBoEF4QzdA@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARCKwuj7BBoEF4QzdA@googlegroups.com designates 10.180.90.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.90.79; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARCKwuj7BBoEF4QzdA@googlegroups.com designates 10.180.90.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARCKwuj7BBoEF4QzdA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARCKwuj7BBoEF4QzdA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.90.79]) by 10.180.90.79 with SMTP id bu15mr6777270wib.0.1333403922490 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=83nnlTpO/BPOPiZ9yxAMgJrJFb1KQGQpVG9VybLILpg=; b=bMHJ0tZecEePam2AAN4oE5KIk9JFUkDpqf6jYJzD39SQi7/gd14XBRNedjTR9t5KXb yQVtvSGC86B9OQWAStqoBkUCK/qVBQbVbk0HiiAcKnROPyUoLOGDTnj1mqUORIeoan5+ XV47qku0QncnyhaWMhoRJh6h0MZp0TvSY8fWs= Received: by 10.180.90.79 with SMTP id bu15mr1382890wib.0.1333403914542; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.221.80 with SMTP id q58ls6329936wep.0.gmail; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.93.68 with SMTP id cs4mr1795247wib.3.1333403914028; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.93.68 with SMTP id cs4mr1795246wib.3.1333403914018; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p3si6965521wip.3.2012.04.02.14.58.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.25; Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32600224BD for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:58:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:58:33 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 1jlj1+4WeedTBisHi9t9oee7S/u3o1xa/A6S3mpecrRm 1333403912 Received: from inari.ethans.dre.am (client-86-25-230-25.lds-bng-012.adsl.virginmedia.net [86.25.230.25]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DDE6482623 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:58:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:58:29 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Linuxemu and Slackware 11.0, preliminary report Message-ID: <20120402225829.2c702eab@inari.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: <22f9bb5f1e6440b7bf02a6e067a81dd1@rei2.9hal> References: <20120402151642.73e72f38@inari.ethans.dre.am> <22f9bb5f1e6440b7bf02a6e067a81dd1@rei2.9hal> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@fastmail.fm Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:51:40 +0200 cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > you can try with something like: > > hget -r 'Referer: http://example.com/' http://example.com/foo.jpg > > to see if the problem is the missing referer header. > > implementing referers woul'v been the task of mothra, but i'm not > sure if referers are a good idea even given how mutch it is abused > for spam and user tracking these days. > > -- > cinap Ah, that's it exactly. I wonder if webfs or mothra could add headers on a site-specific basis, perhaps passing every url to a script and incorporating what the script gives back or loading a table of at startup.