From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.50.47 with SMTP id y35csp288927yhb; Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARDY6sH9BBoEF70teQ@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARDY6sH9BBoEF70teQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.135.135 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.229.135.135; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARDY6sH9BBoEF70teQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.135.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARDY6sH9BBoEF70teQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARDY6sH9BBoEF70teQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.229.135.135]) by 10.229.135.135 with SMTP id n7mr618470qct.19.1336964440415 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FCORbWexdmuZmVJUVc7aaVw7W9tZrmsa5oHmgG8dkD0=; b=CyedHswUecfskezaQ4l2Z4aSSzFHXaL6u3yr6LRTkWjHKonEAlVt9hukKtWTDrYSMJ FnGFCke57qDepduuEJZ2kxzdi8dOpF/MDFpUdkODKVAMPjVQD5sl2zJWJ2ZJICcOuKKs UIvtjsKjbkHKBl/tePxEzMRyg19kuGZfOPm1g= Received: by 10.229.135.135 with SMTP id n7mr80175qct.19.1336964440272; Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.76.89 with SMTP id b25ls5452722qck.5.gmail; Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.97.134 with SMTP id l6mr2962590qan.6.1336964439815; Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.97.134 with SMTP id l6mr2962589qan.6.1336964439806; Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a39si7112089qch.0.2012.05.13.20.00.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.25; Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDBD2159C for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 13 May 2012 23:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 May 2012 23:00:39 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: XbKfTL1Hlp41VubOMHApku3Jn9+Cu8VPvl0j1lQKu/hD 1336964439 Received: from inari.ethans.dre.am (client-81-105-140-221.lds-bng-012.adsl.virginmedia.net [81.105.140.221]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECB71482521 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 13 May 2012 23:00:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 04:00:36 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: User interface improvement Message-ID: <20120514040036.6580ecc9@inari.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: <78e3634c5e377ea6eedaa5c2720e2338@rei2.9hal> References: <20120505211601.2db7b3bd@inari.ethans.dre.am> <78e3634c5e377ea6eedaa5c2720e2338@rei2.9hal> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@fastmail.fm Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 5 May 2012 23:44:57 +0200 cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > well, why not screen->chan chan instead? then the colors are always in > the same format as the display. (unless you change color resolution > later) good point. i guess the worst case if we do this is starting vga in 8-bit mode by mistake and change after. it's not like it would hurt rio.