From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.189.66 with SMTP id b42csp180399yhn; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCMnN582LARDdu-H_BBoEq_acCA@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARDdu-H_BBoEq_acCA@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.36.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.36.52; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCMnN582LARDdu-H_BBoEq_acCA@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.36.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCMnN582LARDdu-H_BBoEq_acCA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCMnN582LARDdu-H_BBoEq_acCA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.36.52]) by 10.52.36.52 with SMTP id n20mr2692976vdj.4.1341677021723 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9bbLSnnYScoRhYMswAEqFwEZycnSu/SgR32dPMIJD6w=; b=Ye9E3YqfyEXTj/Wr6G0sdKneWnsfuOPuyHs5HRPXRt12hsBV0XFXMOPcVB1BvgCvk/ TpRX5GTCW9L9AIUSs2XiVVsIFILfdtbt5bQ+4mMb2pOtCRpJho5CWrMF7iff2Sbmwzk4 LRH2h2ZlbFsw70iOl2MN91Weg/2s+DznDj0MQ= Received: by 10.52.36.52 with SMTP id n20mr674095vdj.4.1341677021569; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.230.4 with SMTP id jk4ls5514864vcb.4.gmail; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.89.129 with SMTP id bo1mr27178044vdb.0.1341677021291; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.89.129 with SMTP id bo1mr27178043vdb.0.1341677021282; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.25]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y20si3090112vdd.0.2012.07.07.09.03.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.25; Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E8B20BB2 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:03:40 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: RHT7zhXWkYZJ02hWjVdTOXL7Hk4fwPtMHkf9X94qxvhB 1341677020 Received: from vardo.ethans.dre.am (unknown [81.105.136.221]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 521518E01D8 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:03:37 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: mothra ignores
, funky text entry Message-ID: <20120707170337.78b5b96a@vardo.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: <44e208ed0862417528244ba95064ea72@rei2.9hal> References: <1341659578.30781.140661098969033.19203867@webmail.messagingengine.com> <44e208ed0862417528244ba95064ea72@rei2.9hal> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i486-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: eekee57@fastmail.fm X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eekee57@fastmail.fm designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eekee57@fastmail.fm; dkim=pass header.i=@fastmail.fm Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 15:13:31 +0200 cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > fixed. thanks! it's not right yet, it's still treating multiple consecutive br tags as one, but it's a definite improvement. -- This is obviously some strange usage of the word "simple" that I was previously unaware of.