From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ur; Wed Oct 28 20:20:54 EDT 2015 Received: (qmail 94261 invoked by uid 1001); 29 Oct 2015 00:20:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:20:51 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Ports Tree utilities inclusion into 9front Message-ID: <20151029002051.GB92033@wopr.sciops.net> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stable advanced service app realtime-java-oriented content-driven locator Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <465c54d7213b1a58970ac91aea22d8a0@styx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465c54d7213b1a58970ac91aea22d8a0@styx> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:50:33PM -0400, mveety@mveety.com wrote: > I want the core ports tree[1] utilities added to /rc/bin/. > It doesn't really have many users currently (I think) because it's hard for users to find and > use. While I don't want the entire ports tree added, I would like the ports utilities > (ports/setup, ports/install, ports/update) included into 9front with the manpage ports(8). > This shit will be optional (you never have to use it), but it's there if someone needs it. I'm not a priori opposed to this inclusion, but why not just put ports/ in your contrib, and then we can include it in the fqa? khm