From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ur; Sat Feb 11 16:23:42 EST 2017
Received: (qmail 34166 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Feb 2017 21:23:34 -0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:23:34 -0800
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] nupas spf checker: outdated ip bans
Message-ID: <20170211212334.GF18221@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1702112021000.4258@phi>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1702112034500.4258@phi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1702112034500.4258@phi>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: polling storage 

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Julius Schmidt wrote:
> on second thought, the whole cidrokay() check should go away, i.e. i 
> propose we replace cidrokay() with "return 1;"

I support this.

> - disallow any email from the ranges

Among other things, why is the SPF checker screwing around with IP
ranges to start with?   I am assuming it was just a convenient place to
put these tests, but regardless, the tests are dated and arguably
useless anyway.

khm