From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ur; Fri May 5 11:24:46 EDT 2017 Received: (qmail 37919 invoked by uid 1001); 5 May 2017 08:24:42 -0700 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:24:42 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] bio io functions Message-ID: <20170505152442.GA37775@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <59AA0986-4688-43AA-B194-D184EAFCBAC0@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: flexible rails property-aware method On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:29:08PM +1000, Bruce Ellis wrote: > Go programs run fine on plan9. Some go programs might on specific architectures until we have to patch the kernel again etc > There are many benefits in replacing plan9 > programs with a Go equivalent, e.g. the widespread deployment of algorithms > that use parallelism. What a faster cleaner world it would be. Go's GC shit is incompatible with security. I know a lot of programmers are excited about the new models of training wheels but there will always be places where you're going to have to use a real programming language sorry about your world khm