From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ur; Sat Jun 10 03:42:42 EDT 2017
Received: (qmail 84380 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jun 2017 00:42:37 -0700
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 00:42:37 -0700
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] webpaste: fail if file unreadable
Message-ID: <20170610074237.GA6818@wopr>
Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org
References: <b79a0306d6095efbaca5d22f25e92f5c@firemail.cc>
 <20170609163053.GB81475@wopr>
 <35bcceb1f15ff6a173e48999d8e5efcf@firemail.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <35bcceb1f15ff6a173e48999d8e5efcf@firemail.cc>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: advanced SOAP over YAML cache service service 

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:40:44PM +0000, raiz@firemail.cc wrote:
> 
> it doesn't fail though
> 

I'm advocating that hpost should test for an unreadable file, not
webpaste.  

khm