From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fortimail.online.lv ([81.198.164.220]) by ewsd; Tue Nov 13 15:44:06 EST 2018 Received: from mailo-proxy2 (smtp.online.lv [81.198.164.193]) by fortimail.online.lv with ESMTP id wADKhtmh019315-wADKhtmj019315 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:43:55 +0200 Received: from mailo-b6 (10.95.60.11) by mailo-proxy2 (Axigen) with ESMTPA id 006005; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:43:55 +0200 Received: from mailo-proxy1 (10.95.60.3) by mailo-b6 (Axigen) with ESMTPA id 1A9BE4; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:43:55 +0200 Received: from localhost (46.109.88.150) by mailo-proxy1 (Axigen) with ESMTPA id 141961; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:43:55 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:43:54 +0200 From: Antons Suspans To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] sed bug? Message-ID: <20181113204354.GA25631@ax.s16> References: <20181113200401.GA18169@master> <20181113212806.523d19f7@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181113212806.523d19f7@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) DomainKey-Status: no signature DKIM-Status: no signature X-AXIGEN-DK-Result: No records X-AXIGEN-DKIM-Result: No records List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: asynchronous general-purpose cache base-aware interface On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 09:28:06PM +0100, Eckard Brauer wrote: > BTW, GNU sed (Linux) seems to behave similar. The man page of GNU sed describes this behavior explicitly: "if addr2 is a regexp, it will not be tested against the line that addr1 matched" (Man pages of Plan 9 are typically less tormenting.)