From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ewsd; Wed Jun 26 22:33:26 EDT 2019 Received: (qmail 70635 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Jun 2019 19:33:14 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:33:14 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] 9FRONT RETURNS TO PRINT WITH STUNNING NINE VOLUME SERIES Message-ID: <20190627023314.GA70473@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <5dba54dc-a392-4b97-a028-3bdc0fb04d5f@Spark> <8db9ec20-9b2f-4a1c-b69a-95ea8cef8acb@Spark> <40c8b4feab4afe76@orthanc.ca> <40c8b54ff2011e64@orthanc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40c8b54ff2011e64@orthanc.ca> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: transactional self-healing information table frontend On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:29:07PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Seriously, though, a copyright suit needs to show actual loss > of income. There's no chance in hell that any entity-of-the-week > that purports to own any 1990s UNIX IP could claim a loss from anybody > reprinting a bunch of papers that never were marketed for sale. > > Okay, there were the 9th and 10th edition manuals. You, me, and maybe > 200 others bought copies. They have been out of print for decades. No > loss of income could ever be imputed. > > --lyndon are you offering to pay to litigate this