From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ewsd; Wed Jul 15 13:13:09 EDT 2020 Received: (qmail 17717 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Jul 2020 10:13:03 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:13:03 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] drawterm stuck Message-ID: <20200715171303.GH96141@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <15B350A3-10DE-424C-93BE-3146669E20AA@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: session session SSL over ORM module extension markup general-purpose manager On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:02:30AM -0700, William Gunnells wrote: > For such genius and beautiful OS why a slow web server. It kind of doesn’t make sense. Let me know if I’m missing something. Even if its file based shouldn’t there be some level of speed. Like hash tables seem to be extremely fast for lookup. Is it because they wrote httpd in one or two days? > > Would it be better to have httpd dedicated to its own CPU and serve other files somewhere else. Serve files on a beefy server. Or am I thinking about that wrong. Should httpd be together? How does that work? > > I realize I have a lot to re-learn about this. But I’m very interested. > > Surely this should be faster than some python based Django server running gunicorn? nobody gives a shit about optimizing web servers