From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from forward105p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.108]) by ewsd; Tue Jul 21 09:11:02 EDT 2020 Received: from mxback7j.mail.yandex.net (mxback7j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::110]) by forward105p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3C5EA4D40374 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:02:45 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c14:4fa6:0:640:e7f6:fb70]) by mxback7j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id UkV8mgnBKv-2j6aYDga; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:02:45 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1595336565; bh=MnYYWvx9qL0x3HW1ut1qY4dXBtyqe3HY0uwFsUPdxJ8=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:References:Date:Message-ID; b=L+HTodPNPSbgmPQnkDBkEvmrGBjcQkcvnA1FlKNGOtcrrq1Fv9ilPcAcnKYy/xcR4 3m5aBlQH3Zh0g+t53oOztZuLD+53d0sQWs4cUSwp1fYZWsnKf1oR5HquhdLrerRQ8B mDKarFxA655s5hr5dUEV8DDZfW5bNrdaFqEXI5xA= Authentication-Results: mxback7j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id zRtGpGPUz4-2iEqMgSt; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:02:44 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:02:43 +0200 From: Steffen Nurpmeso To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] patch smtp: ignore unrecognized certificates Message-ID: <20200721130243.wCkC4%sdaoden@yandex.com> In-Reply-To: <20200720221909.GB55786@wopr> References: <20200720220016.lADRh%sdaoden@yandex.com> <6D952754AB9D27E80055574342EDA465@eigenstate.org> <20200720221909.GB55786@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.19-87-gef7dc32e OpenPGP: id=EE19E1C1F2F7054F8D3954D8308964B51883A0DD; url=https://ftp.sdaoden.eu/steffen.asc; preference=signencrypt BlahBlahBlah: Any stupid boy can crush a beetle. But all the professors in the world can make no bugs. List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: encrypted API DOM-aware locator Kurt H Maier wrote in <20200720221909.GB55786@wopr>: |On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:15PM -0700, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: |>> In November 2019 they waved through RFC 8689: |> |> Nice, with luck we'll be able to turn it on by 2029 :) | |It is a failure of the IETF process that this sort of crap (which |recommends MTA-STS) is shoved through while taking extremely simple |steps like "standardizing an SMTP+TLS port" is regarded as impossible. |I suggest the current approach (manually confirming fingerprints or else |declaring them irrelevant) is superior in just about every way. Yes. Luckily "SUBMISSIONS" on 465 is finally also standardized. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)