From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by ewsd; Mon Sep 21 16:14:44 EDT 2020 Received: (qmail 29132 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Sep 2020 11:27:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:27:54 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] test Message-ID: <20200921182754.GC43872@wopr> Mail-Followup-To: 9front@9front.org References: <5F0A6AD0-ECFA-4383-B0F6-4C3EB0508B1B@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: software-based polling-aware TOR over XMPP general-purpose database On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:51:46AM -0700, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > > From a non-comprehensive survey (some google groups, > 9fans): Option 3: they rewrite stuff and sign it again > with their own key. > > OpenBSD mailing lists forward without munging. > This is why on some lists (I think TUHS, maybe others) you get some messages from the recipient (these are from non-DKIM senders) and some messages from "Original Sender via TUHS" with a TUHS reply-to and TUHS DKIM signature. khm