From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from alarum.de ([159.69.146.68]) by ewsd; Mon Sep 21 14:00:53 EDT 2020
Received: from lenovo.sphairon.box (p4fe74979.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.231.73.121])
	by alarum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 026FE1B8D67
	for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:54:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:54:29 +0200
From: Stefan Hertenberger <stefan@alarum.de>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: *****SPAM***** [9front] test
Message-ID: <20200921195429.4839eb21@lenovo.sphairon.box>
In-Reply-To: <1E3083B627E4EDD1DF08AA61E95E4DA2@a-b.xyz>
References: <1E3083B627E4EDD1DF08AA61E95E4DA2@a-b.xyz>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on vbsd.alarum.de
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: agile ActivityPub over SOAP strategy module enhancement 

Am Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:40:20 +0200
schrieb kvik@a-b.xyz:

> Spam detection software, running on the system "vbsd.alarum.de",
> has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
> message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
> postmaster for details.
> 
> Content preview:  I've changed DMARC policy to 'none'. Let's see if
> this mail still gets to spam. P.S. Sorry for spamming the list. 
> 
> Content analysis details:   (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> -------------------------------------------------- -0.0
> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4      RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [94.23.1.103
> listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR
> NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.  See
>                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
>                              for more information.
>                             [URIs: a-b.xyz]
>  0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
>                             mail domains are different
>  0.0 T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD    Untrustworthy TLDs
>                             [URI: a-b.xyz (xyz)]
>  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
>  0.9 SPF_FAIL               SPF: sender does not match SPF record
> (fail) [SPF failed: Please see
> http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=9front-bounces%40ewsd.inri.net;ip=94.23.1.103;r=vbsd.alarum.de]
> 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
> necessarily valid 0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature
> exists, but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational:
> message has unparseable relay lines
> -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
>  2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
>  1.3 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host
> with no rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
> 
> 

hi,

SpamAssassin still thinks this is spam.

Stefan