From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr ([93.17.128.202]) by ewsd; Thu Oct 22 08:11:26 -0400 2020 Received: from cauchy.polynum.local (89.121.198.77.rev.sfr.net [77.198.121.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by msfrf2621.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 3A46C1C00041B for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:17 +0200 (CEST) X-mail-filterd: 1.0.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT X-sfr-spamrating: 40 X-sfr-spam: not-spam DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=polynum.com; s=202006; t=1603368677; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; bh=abWZ+RIlSUCU 3uXCrXEyfO3kwpJXhaK9h3CSr8D6zgg=; b=XhvsRSMrc6dCG0mZsiS5dvVVQ699FDJaEP0y366L cVSMHVPMwo2mWV7zqi4odDcdhmzqK/0iY1chcPWJ/2Vu0lAwSPbKPSS3cvflz3SNkrz0DUU+Xtyj XvNp53BzTXYRl/+1O3I398hIW4Jc88Vsh+CbfgnGLMIHoyY4mPaWSJpIsPKkT223uieLAOvZpIfM OXspagAj9hMnE9ULobBCyEXj97Uxa3ycmKJuDX4MFdMNIR7kOXjnZVa1Q9uqIVqXn+QzhMhZipGP MQdvx87yC38A4FRcBTv5+//nugb6vfWGHjvVZHBRC3fpu8pJeAtRq6z62HHH84unLmHLnU54Fw== ; Received: from cauchy.polynum.local (89.121.198.77.rev.sfr.net [77.198.121.89]) by msfrf2621.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1DAA71C000405 for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cauchy.polynum.local (89.121.198.77.rev.sfr.net [77.198.121.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by msfrf2621.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cauchy.polynum.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cauchy.polynum.local (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09MCBGoe000394 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from tlaronde@localhost) by cauchy.polynum.local (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id 09MCBFOY000077 for 9front@9front.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: cauchy.polynum.local: tlaronde set sender to thierry.laronde@sfr.fr using -f Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:11:15 +0200 From: tlaronde@polynum.com To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] rc: null list in concatenation line numbers Message-ID: <20201022121115.GA41@polynum.com> References: <71CE86A5EC086742886B6A2E7F09C255@eigenstate.org> <9661591FC410B16CA272B221336B866C@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9661591FC410B16CA272B221336B866C@eigenstate.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic enhancement package HTML over YAML self-signing-aware template controller Hello, On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 06:18:28PM -0700, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > > Testing and review welcome. > > Another iteration: This one caps the number of filenames > that we put into the name table. It's pointless to past > the name table past the maximum number of files that fit > into the location. FWIW, since the error I have when calling a rc script (hget(1)) from a sh script under APE is "null list in concatenation", having something to do with the definition of "path" been apparently empty (I have to set it explicitely before calling hget), I tried the patches. This queer problem under APE (in a very peculiar context because I have been unable to find a small example reproducing the behavior) is still there---I don't pretend the patches were to address this problem; I simply tried them, because of the subject line "null list in concatenation", to see if by side effect they would solve it. Best, -- Thierry Laronde http://www.kergis.com/ http://www.kergis.com/kertex.html http://www.sbfa.fr/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C