* [9front] POSIX_SOURCE vs POSIX_C_SOURCE (ape stdlib.h)
@ 2021-09-25 3:49 Jens Staal
2021-09-25 4:03 ` ori
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Staal @ 2021-09-25 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
Everywhere else in APE it is ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE but in stdlib.h there is
one instance of _POSIX_C_SOURCE is this intentional?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] POSIX_SOURCE vs POSIX_C_SOURCE (ape stdlib.h)
2021-09-25 3:49 [9front] POSIX_SOURCE vs POSIX_C_SOURCE (ape stdlib.h) Jens Staal
@ 2021-09-25 4:03 ` ori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: ori @ 2021-09-25 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
Quoth Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>:
> Everywhere else in APE it is ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE but in stdlib.h there is
> one instance of _POSIX_C_SOURCE is this intentional?
They're different:
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html
We probably don't use them right, but you'll have to read the
relevant specs to figure out what 'right' means.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-25 4:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-25 3:49 [9front] POSIX_SOURCE vs POSIX_C_SOURCE (ape stdlib.h) Jens Staal
2021-09-25 4:03 ` ori
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).