From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 30267 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2023 21:05:43 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Nov 2023 21:05:43 -0000
Received: from cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de ([89.1.8.211]) by 9front; Sat Nov 25 16:03:58 -0500 2023
Received: from cc-app3.netcologne.de (cc-app3.netcologne.de [89.1.9.192])
	by cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B684126B3
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:03:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de;
	s=nc1116a; t=1700946235;
	bh=qGbxku6Gll1seU3Tc5vtNWGXkxLqmmkq+02fQ89uxDk=;
	h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From;
	b=jxAk9OkU+lIc/SDh2BRQw0dVgS7NxiyY3v4vLcm6yCgDxDGiZ20yAN9rdIG9RifpE
	 ZzijmFHzvPPH5p7my+RWBpP/krcamxi71YpotzvTGtQrEt+zpgBmerdmERQOjkoWLH
	 LuBmzXBZbQ9loLK02Hv7AqRb1D50OxuCmbHNbynXOsUOIa4o3fKRQwuKNm9FuxuL2w
	 FF80bOIRsPdrqvljBDnzMBcfLGXXhHXJgbdLwhufiy1837alYN/NZyhlrUOFCarR56
	 l0//eg+4coJ2EcDGrZU5XAxEm+hD5izF9Ioprh+rBOzvMIoGbOp9dqLaKE/dWMp6UA
	 yhRrZEMmFKdow==
Received: from cc-app3.netcologne.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cc-app3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3244E11E56
	for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:03:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:03:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Arne Meyer <meyer.arne83@netcologne.de>
To: 9front@9front.org
Message-ID: <205431961.2688729.1700946235136@comcenter.netcologne.de>
In-Reply-To: <64AB27AF39DB00EB174B1EC2576E7CDF@felloff.net>
References: <1375031432.2686734.1700936861177@comcenter.netcologne.de>
 <64AB27AF39DB00EB174B1EC2576E7CDF@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev50
X-Originating-IP: 2001:4dd1:73f0:0:c6d9:499f:4aee:8218
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3244E11E56
X-Spamd-Bar: -
X-Rspamd-Action: no action
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: scale-out immutable AJAX storage hypervisor high-performance module 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] ipv6 flow label support
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Jep,

section 3 says; and i quote "source nodes SHOULD assign each unrelated transport connection and application data stream to a new flow." i chose the fnv hash because it's supposed to have a uniform distribution of hash values that satisfies the RFC.

> cinap_lenrek@felloff.net hat am 25.11.2023 21:51 CET geschrieben:
> 
>  
> rfc6437?
> 
> --
> cinap