From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA4A211F7 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2024 00:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.ljabl.com ([88.99.6.227]) by 9front; Sat Oct 5 18:05:11 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ljabl.com; s=20220906; t=1728165909; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6G4DBGkXfwqPZAHvzY8cvXa2QhR9A0vlGgmeHrGXpuw=; b=NLTrnYz6DJIjcUB79bRA4mYEBr4GykbZPa4Hm0yaAiGd3AL+J+xztgccBYX8gppwirhV6P oJwSCtJv/VGYHpUfd6Jo5sImCawLbXApPx2sJhjnChzxlSP8IVE9abnfbYAT9A0mXyyanJ toqqhBClR39IYqwcRK4xWx3JxioZ5Wg= Received: by ljabl.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3434bf29 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 22:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 22:05:01 +0000 From: Lennart Jablonka To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <244D2B54-DE3E-4AB2-B3A5-DC6ACE9D6AF0@ljabl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: content-addressed configuration GPU method deep-learning-based controller Subject: Re: [9front] LN macro Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk >I don=E2=80=99t see much of a reason not to imitate Groff=E2=80=99s UR/UE = macros=2E I confused ms and man, didn=E2=80=99t I?