From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7777 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2021 05:39:07 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Aug 2021 05:39:07 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 1ess; Sun Aug 15 01:30:07 -0400 2021 Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-225.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.225]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c4a3024d (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 21:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2546899778DD6DE6C94E3CD2479DE396@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 00:29:49 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <605UOuc1gFumGx1E1zUXXNTFlTKzgNBX_DXSB0TEwDrovm8WBMQQBvmj-MeHhIrsEWvG6flY7XrDj4RWZNppZTbyui5wjECjkdWJOpXUfMo=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: self-healing abstract hosting wrapper-based XML event-aware module Subject: Re: [9front] PATCH: click-to-focus in fgui Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Philip Silva : > Hover to focus can be quite practical though I think. It can be for large screen elements, but for small input fields, if the mouse drifts just the least bit as I let go of it, it becomes unusable for me. (I can't use acme without the '-b' flag either.) Since the rest of the system is click to focus, is there a strong argument for keeping it the way it is?