From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from alt2.a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk ([90.155.4.51]) by ewsd; Thu Feb 6 05:11:15 EST 2020 Received: from 132.198.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.198.132] helo=quintile.net) by a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ize7X-0004Us-SM for 9front@9front.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:10:51 +0000 Received: from [172.24.208.48] ([83.219.41.164]) by quintile.net; Thu Feb 6 10:10:49 GMT 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Steve Simon Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [9front] Netsurf 3.9 for Plan 9 (work in progress) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:10:48 +0000 Message-Id: <2E2042F5-BA16-4CB7-BA4C-E937B36E03AC@quintile.net> References: In-Reply-To: To: 9front@9front.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: immutable shared service standard caching really helps a lot. uriel hacked the labs webfs to crudely add caching, though 9front uses a rew= rite of webfs by cinap (much better). i would suggest a cache should be a separate program but maybe one webfs ins= erts into its flow, like aan is inserted by import. i also wondered if a cache could/should make use of a global cache for non-a= uthenticated connections, so all users share the cache for the google homepa= ge but not for their bank. i don't know enough about the web to know if this= is feasible. -Steve On 6 Feb 2020, at 8:18 am, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFwhy cache at all?